EOR Vietnam

Compare · Vietnam

EOR vs PEO in Vietnam: what’s the difference?

EOR and PEO in Vietnam are often sold as two versions of the same thing. They are not. An employer of record (EOR) is the legal employer of your worker in Vietnam, while the US-style PEO “co-employment” model has no clean basis in Vietnamese law — so most “PEO Vietnam” offers are really an EOR, or admin-only support, under another name.

Updated · 9 min read · Reviewed against instruments in force

EOR Vietnam fee

US$149

per employee per month, flat, for Vietnamese nationals. No setup or hidden fees.

Get a quote
Note

This is general information comparing two engagement models in Vietnam, not legal, tax or payroll advice. Every figure below is sourced and stated as of October 2026. The only contact for this site is info@eorvietnam.vn.

An employer of record is a single, fully formed legal employer. A professional employer organisation (PEO) is a co-employment arrangement built around United States labour law, and it has no direct equivalent in Vietnam. This guide defines each model, explains why co-employment does not map onto Vietnamese law, and shows which one actually applies when you hire in Vietnam.

What is an employer of record (EOR)?

An employer of record (EOR) in Vietnam is a company that legally employs your worker through its own Vietnam-registered entity, so you can hire without opening one yourself. The EOR signs the Labour Code employment contract, runs monthly payroll in Vietnamese dong, pays statutory social, health and unemployment insurance, and withholds personal income tax, while you direct the day-to-day work.

The defining feature of an EOR is that it is the single, unambiguous legal employer. One Vietnam-registered company signs one contract and carries every employer obligation and liability under Vietnamese law; you are the functional manager, not a second employer. On top of gross salary that employer bears about 23.5% in statutory on-costs — 17.5% social insurance, 3% health insurance, 1% unemployment insurance and a 2% trade-union fee — as of October 2026.12 The itemised breakdown sits on Vietnam’s employer payroll costs and the roughly 23.5% statutory on-cost, and the full definition is on what an employer of record is and how it works.

Because Vietnam has no statute that uses the words “employer of record”, an EOR runs on one of two lawful routes: direct employment by a Vietnam-registered company under a service agreement, or licensed labour sub-leasing. Which route a provider uses decides who bears liability — set out under the two lawful routes an EOR can use in Vietnam. What matters for this comparison is that, either way, the employer is one defined Vietnamese entity, not a shared pair.

What is a PEO (professional employer organisation)?

A professional employer organisation (PEO) is a model from the United States in which the provider and the client act as co-employers of the same worker. The PEO administers payroll, tax filings and benefits under its own registration, while the client stays the common-law employer that directs the staff and remains legally responsible for them — the two share employer duties under a contractual split. The crucial point is what a genuine PEO does not do: it does not let you employ people in a country where you have no legal presence. It works precisely because the client is already an employer with its own entity — the opposite of the problem an EOR solves, which is hiring when you have no entity at all.

The term has also drifted: some providers market a “global PEO” that, on inspection, is an EOR — the legal employer abroad, not a co-employer alongside you. So the useful question about any “PEO” offer is not what it is called but who signs the employment contract and who is liable. What a PEO really means in this market, and why most offers here are something else, is set out on what a PEO in Vietnam actually is.

Does co-employment exist in Vietnam?

Co-employment has no clean basis in Vietnamese law. The Labour Code is built around a single legal employer for each contract and codifies no shared-employer relationship, and it applies a substance test: any arrangement with paid work, wages and one party directing or supervising the worker is treated as an employment relationship, whatever the document is called (Labour Code 2019, Art. 13).3 As of October 2026, whether employer liabilities could also attach to an overseas client that directs the worker is an untested argument, not settled law — so keep day-to-day direction clear and take advice.

That is why a “PEO Vietnam” offer is almost always something else in substance: an EOR that directly employs the worker through its own entity, or a payroll and HR service bolted onto an entity you already own — not a true co-employer alongside you. The full legal picture, including the joint-employer and shared-liability arguments, is set out on whether co-employment is legal in Vietnam; the related permanent-establishment risk when using an EOR is covered under co-employment and permanent-establishment risk when using an EOR.

EOR vs PEO in Vietnam compared

This comparison comes down to who the legal employer is and whether you need your own entity. An EOR is the legal employer and needs no entity from you. A PEO assumes you are already an employer and shares duties with you — a split Vietnamese law does not recognise. Put the other way round, PEO vs EOR in Vietnam is less a real contest than a choice between an EOR and running your own entity. The table sets out the practical differences.

EOR vs PEO for hiring in Vietnam — general guidance, not legal advice (as of October 2026)
Factor EOR PEO (co-employment)
Legal employer The EOR’s Vietnam entity Not clearly defined in Vietnamese law
Who signs the employment contract The EOR entity, alone A shared split that does not translate to Vietnam
Your own Vietnamese entity needed No Yes — the model assumes you already employ
Payroll, insurance and tax Run by the EOR as employer Administered for you; you stay the employer
Liability for compliance Sits with the EOR entity Argued to be shared — untested in Vietnam
Main risk to watch Permanent-establishment and co-employment arguments Co-employment has no clean Vietnamese basis
Best for Hiring in Vietnam with no local entity Admin support where you already employ staff

Which should you use in Vietnam?

Which to use in Vietnam is usually straightforward. If you have no Vietnamese entity and want to employ someone there, you need an EOR, because only a Vietnam-registered company can be the legal employer. A PEO in the US co-employment sense does not apply. If you already run a Vietnamese entity and only want payroll and HR administration, an administrative service — sometimes labelled a “PEO” — can take that load.

In other words, the choice is rarely EOR against a true PEO; it is EOR against doing it yourself through an entity you own or set up. If you are weighing that, the cost and speed trade-off is worked through under using an EOR versus setting up your own entity in Vietnam, and what an engagement actually costs is on what an EOR in Vietnam costs. If instead you are tempted to avoid employment altogether by paying someone as a contractor, read first about the misclassification risk of engaging a contractor who is really an employee, then how to hire and pay a contractor in Vietnam compliantly.

Whatever a provider calls its product, judge it on who signs the contract, who is the legal employer, and who is liable — and ask it to put the answer in writing. The questions worth asking before you sign are set out under how to choose an EOR provider in Vietnam, or — if a provider is pitching a “PEO” — how to choose a PEO in Vietnam; the wider rules for employing people in Vietnam run across our Vietnam employer guides. EOR Vietnam provides the employer-of-record service in Vietnam directly, as the single legal employer, so if you would rather we assess your situation, request a costed EOR Vietnam quote.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between an EOR and a PEO?

An employer of record is the sole legal employer of your worker, so you need no entity of your own. A professional employer organisation (PEO) is a co-employer that shares employer duties with you and assumes you are already an employer with your own entity. In short, an EOR replaces the employer; a PEO sits alongside one.

Does a PEO work in Vietnam?

Not in the US co-employment sense. Vietnamese law recognises a single legal employer per contract and has no codified shared-employer model, so a true PEO arrangement does not translate. A “PEO Vietnam” offer is usually an EOR that directly employs the worker, or a payroll and HR service added to an entity you already own.

Who is the legal employer under an EOR vs a PEO?

Under an EOR, the provider’s Vietnam-registered entity is the legal employer and carries the obligations. Under a US-style PEO, you and the provider are co-employers and liability is shared. In Vietnam that shared split has no clean legal basis, so a compliant arrangement needs a single named entity as the employer.

Do I need my own entity for an EOR or a PEO in Vietnam?

For an EOR, no: the EOR’s Vietnam-registered entity is the legal employer, so you can hire without one of your own. A PEO assumes the opposite — that you already have a Vietnamese entity and are the employer, with the provider administering payroll and HR alongside you. With no local entity, an EOR is the route that lets you employ someone compliantly. Whether that shared-employer split is even recognised is covered under whether co-employment is legal in Vietnam.

Sources

  1. PwC Worldwide Tax Summaries — Vietnam — employer social, health and unemployment insurance of 21.5% of gross salary (17.5% social insurance, 3% health, 1% unemployment). Accessed 2 Oct 2026.
  2. Law on Trade Unions No. 50/2024/QH15 — 2% trade-union fee on the compulsory social-insurance salary fund, payable by all employers whether or not an in-house union exists. In force 1 Jul 2025. Accessed 2 Oct 2026.
  3. Labour Code No. 45/2019/QH14 — Art. 13 (substance-over-form test for an employment relationship). In force 1 Jan 2021. Accessed 2 Oct 2026.